Commit the proposed action, declared evidence, required checks, and policy version at the moment of consequence.
Summit Cognitive · Standard paid pilot
One consequential workflow.
Thirty days to an inspectable record.
Instrument the point where an agent's output becomes a real decision or action. Preserve what was proposed, what was checked, who held authority, and what remained unresolved—even after the originating AI conversation is unavailable.
STANDARD PILOT$7,500flat · 30 days
If the parties sign an annual agreement, any pilot-fee credit is governed by the written order form.
BUYER ROOM · LOCAL SELF-CHECK
Check whether the standard pilot fits.
Start with where the checkpoint must live. You will get the smallest useful path—not a forced sales form.
START HERE
Choose the place you need control.
No account or contact details are required for this fit check.
This check stays in this browser; nothing is saved or sent to Summit.The survival contract
Decisions that survive scrutiny.
The pilot does not promise to recreate a stochastic model's answer. It preserves a bounded record that an authorized reviewer can inspect without the originating AI session.
Record the person or role with final authority. Higher confidence never creates new permission.
Keep missing evidence, unresolved risk, and unavailable system state visible instead of implying completeness.
Let a reviewer inspect the retained record and test its signature without needing the original conversation.
Tight scope. Working system.
Not a strategy deck.
One instrumented path.
The pilot is intentionally narrow enough to finish and consequential enough to demonstrate the operating difference.
Choose one agentic workflow with a real owner, action boundary, and review burden.
Place receipt generation and verification around the decision or execution point.
Connect evidence, approvals, decision rights, and the workflow's existing controls.
Run the workflow and leave stakeholders with a verification surface and control-mapping pack.
Thirty days, four visible gates
Every phase leaves evidence.
The schedule assumes timely buyer access, approved test data, and the written scope. A missed gate is recorded as a gap, not silently counted as progress.
Fix the boundary, owner, access, data handling, test cases, and order-form acceptance criteria.
Place the request, outcome, and receipt at the agreed controlled decision or execution point.
Run agreed success, Hold, and failure cases with authorized operators and reviewers.
Deliver the demo, verification instructions, control map, known limits, and expansion decision.
Included
The proof package.
One defined agentic path produces a receipt at the relevant boundary.
Portable records of the evidence, approvals, policy result, and attestation captured by the integration.
A way for authorized stakeholders to inspect the receipt and check its signature.
A concrete map from the instrumented workflow to its operating controls for stakeholder review.
Mutual readiness
What your team brings.
What the pilot must show.
These are default scoping and acceptance conditions. The signed order form is authoritative for a specific engagement.
Required to begin
- One named workflow and accountable owner
- An authorized technical path and approved test data
- Current policy or control references
- Security and data-handling constraints
- Available operators, reviewers, and acceptance stakeholders
Required to pass
- The checkpoint appears at the written boundary in the controlled test path.
- Agreed success, Hold, and failure cases return the documented outcome and downstream behavior.
- An authorized reviewer can inspect the agreed fields and invoke verification without the original AI conversation.
- The control map ties each agreed control to evidence, owner, Hold condition, and known limitation.
- Open gaps and non-results remain visible; they are not silently counted as passes.
Not implied by the pilot
- A broad production rollout, model replacement, or model retraining
- Reconstruction of hidden reasoning, unavailable system state, or undisclosed sources and methods
- A declaration that a recommendation is correct, evidence is complete, or risk and compliance obligations are eliminated
- Access, data, custom controls, service levels, or integrations outside the written order form
SYNTHETIC CONTROL-MAP EXAMPLE
Vendor payment release
Existing control: role and threshold approval before release.
- Receipt fields
- Proposed amount band, destination reference, policy version, declared evidence, reviewer role, unresolved exception
- Hold condition
- A required reviewer or check is missing.
- Not established
- Invoice legitimacy, source completeness, funds availability, or legal compliance.
Σ
One practice. Three levels of control.
Start where the consequence appears.
Use personal guidance beside existing tools, adopt the builder contract at a product boundary, or instrument one organizational workflow. The interaction stays legible: agent asks, person decides, proof returns.
Personal guidance→Builder contract→Organizational enforcement
Start with one consequential workflow
Make the next AI-assisted decision survive scrutiny.
Pilot scope, schedule, access, acceptance criteria, fee credit, and commercial terms are finalized in a separate written order form. No deployment is represented as proving correctness, creating legal admissibility, or eliminating operational, legal, or compliance risk.